By Bill Maher
All the time now, I’m starting to hear, "The president had complete
control of Congress for two years, and did everything he wanted." This
is such bullshit. First of all, no president has that much control over
senators. You really think Ben Nelson, whose state deplores Obama,
really feels that much pressure to be loyal to him?
But the bigger issue is, it’s just factually wrong. Democrats had a
"filibuster proof" majority in the senate for a very short period. It
took Al Franken seven months to get seated because of the recount
dispute, and by the time he was, Ted Kennedy was dying. So Democrats
really only had 60 senators from September 24, 2009, when Kennedy’s
replacement was named, until February 4th, 2010, when
Republican Scott Brown won the special election there. The senate was in
session for just 72 days over that period, so that’s how long Obama had
a real Democratic Congress -- 72 days, not two years.
Or, if you like charts:
111th Senate • Source: Wikipedia
One of the things that sucks is that Obama has never figured out a
way to blame Congress for blocking things, presumably out of fear that
it will make him appear weak. But how is he not running more against a
Congress with a serial killer approval rating? He’s literally three or
four times more popular than they are.
Showing posts with label Congress. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Congress. Show all posts
Monday, October 22, 2012
Monday, August 27, 2012
Stimu-late Than Never
by Bill Maher
Question: How come preventing chaos and civil war in Iraq was enough to say, “Bush’s surge worked,” but averting a complete financial meltdown and a second Great Depression isn’t enough to say, “Obama’s stimulus worked”? No, we haven’t achieved full employment, but neither was Iraq transformed to a model of peace and democracy. Have we been conditioned to think of economic success only in terms of immediate prosperity? Don’t you get any points for halting decline? Stopping a free fall? Turning the tide?
Conservatives say “Obama’s policies have failed” but the fact is we need a second stimulus, and Obama has served one up in the form of his jobs bill, which is being cock-blocked in Congress by Republicans. It’s as if the doctor has said to a dying patient, “You need two shots. The first will arrest your illness and save your life and the second will get you healthy and back on your feet.” And Republicans voted against the first injection to stave off death and now they’re refusing the second to stave off an Obama second term. Isn’t it clear Republicans are purposely delaying recovery so they can blame Obama for keeping us bedridden?
Question: How come preventing chaos and civil war in Iraq was enough to say, “Bush’s surge worked,” but averting a complete financial meltdown and a second Great Depression isn’t enough to say, “Obama’s stimulus worked”? No, we haven’t achieved full employment, but neither was Iraq transformed to a model of peace and democracy. Have we been conditioned to think of economic success only in terms of immediate prosperity? Don’t you get any points for halting decline? Stopping a free fall? Turning the tide?
Conservatives say “Obama’s policies have failed” but the fact is we need a second stimulus, and Obama has served one up in the form of his jobs bill, which is being cock-blocked in Congress by Republicans. It’s as if the doctor has said to a dying patient, “You need two shots. The first will arrest your illness and save your life and the second will get you healthy and back on your feet.” And Republicans voted against the first injection to stave off death and now they’re refusing the second to stave off an Obama second term. Isn’t it clear Republicans are purposely delaying recovery so they can blame Obama for keeping us bedridden?
Labels:
2012 Election,
Congress,
Conservatives,
Obama,
Republicans
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)